Quantification of [11C]PIB PET for imaging myelin in the human brain: A test-retest reproducibility study in high-resolution research tomography

51Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

An accurate in vivo measure of myelin content is essential to deepen our insight into the mechanisms underlying demyelinating and dysmyelinating neurological disorders, and to evaluate the effects of emerging remyelinating treatments. Recently [11C]PIB, a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer originally conceived as a beta-amyloid marker, has been shown to be sensitive to myelin changes in preclinical models and humans. In this work, we propose a reference-region methodology for the voxelwise quantification of brain white-matter (WM) binding for [11C]PIB. This methodology consists of a supervised procedure for the automatic extraction of a reference region and the application of the Logan graphical method to generate distribution volume ratio (DVR) maps. This approach was assessed on a test-retest group of 10 healthy volunteers using a high-resolution PET tomograph. The [11C]PIB PET tracer binding was shown to be up to 23% higher in WM compared with gray matter, depending on the image reconstruction. The DVR estimates were characterized by high reliability (outliers <1%) and reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) >0.95). [11C]PIB parametric maps were also found to be significantly correlated (R 2 >0.50) to mRNA expressions of the most represented proteins in the myelin sheath. On the contrary, no correlation was found between [11C]PIB imaging and nonmyelin-associated proteins.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Veronese, M., Bodini, B., García-Lorenzo, D., Battaglini, M., Bongarzone, S., Comtat, C., … Turkheimer, F. E. (2015). Quantification of [11C]PIB PET for imaging myelin in the human brain: A test-retest reproducibility study in high-resolution research tomography. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 35(11), 1771–1782. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2015.120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free