One-year clinical outcome of interventionalist-versus patient-transfer strategies for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction results from the REVERSE-STEMI study

13Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Traditional reperfusion options for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting to non-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI)-capable hospitals generally include onsite fibrinolytics or emergency transfer for PPCIA third option, involving interventionalist transfer, was examined in the REVERSE-STEMI studyMethods and Results: A total of 334 patients with acute STEMI who presented to 5 referral hospitals with angiographic facilities but without interventionalists qualified for PPCI were randomized to receive PPCI with either an interventionalist- (n=165) or a patient-transfer (n=169) strategyThe primary end point of door-to-balloon (D2B) time and secondary end points of left ventricular ejection fraction and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1-year clinical follow-up were compared between the 2 groupsCompared with the patient-transfer strategy, the interventionalisttransfer strategy resulted in a significantly shortened D2B time (median, 92 minutes versus 141 minutes; P>0.0001), with more patients having first balloon angioplasty within 90 minutes (21.2% versus 7.7%, P>0.001)This treatment strategy also was associated with higher left ventricular ejection fraction (0.60±0.07 versus 0.57±0.09, P>0.001) and improved 1-year MACE-free survival (84.8% versus 74.6%, P=0.019)Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed that the interventionalist-transfer strategy was an independent factor for reduced risk of composite MACE (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.88; P=0.003)Conclusions: The interventionalist-transfer strategy for PPCI may be effective in improving the care of patients with STEMI presenting to a non-PPCI-capable hospital, particularly in a congested cosmopolitan region where patient transfers could be prolonged. © 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Q., Yan Zhang, R., Qiu, J. P., Zhang, J. F., Wang, X. L., Jiang, L., … Shen, W. F. (2011). One-year clinical outcome of interventionalist-versus patient-transfer strategies for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction results from the REVERSE-STEMI study. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 4(3), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.958785

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free