Characterization of the Structural and Tribological Properties of Medical Ti6Al4V Alloy Produced in Different Production Parameters Using Selective Laser Melting

35Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The tribological properties of the parts produced by the selective laser melting (SLM) are greatly influenced by the parameters/strategies used in the production and the postproduction heat treatments. Therefore, it is very important to know and control the parameters to be used in production on the tribological properties of the material. In this study, the effects of build orientation, hatch spacing, and heat treatment on the wear performance of medical Ti6Al4V alloy were investigated. The tribological properties of the samples produced by SLM were compared with the tribological characteristics of the parts produced by conventional method (casting). It was determined that the wear resistance of Ti6Al4V alloy increased with the decreasing of hatch spacing in SLM and the wear resistance of the 45° angle on the production table positively affected the relative density rate. The highest surface hardness among the samples was obtained as ∼360 HV0.3 for the sample produced at the 60 μm hatch spacing and 45° build orientation, which was the highest densification rate obtained. The lowest wear rate value was obtained for the sample produced at 60 μm hatch spacing and 45° build orientation where the highest densification rate and highest surface hardness were obtained. The wear rate of this sample was 26% lower than the wear rate of the sample produced by the casting method. The most suitable build orientation was determined as 45° in terms of wear resistance of the alloy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaya, G., Yildiz, F., & Hacisalihoǧlu, A. (2019). Characterization of the Structural and Tribological Properties of Medical Ti6Al4V Alloy Produced in Different Production Parameters Using Selective Laser Melting. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 6(5), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2019.0017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free