Comparison of forearm and conventional bier⇔s blocks for manipulation and reduction of distal radius fractures

26Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Forearm-based Bier’s block has been advocated as a useful anaesthesic technique in hand surgery. However, there is limited data comparing forearm blocks with the conventional Bier’s block. We conducted a randomised controlled trial (n = 30) comparing the two techniques of anaesthesia for manipulation and reduction of closed distal radius fractures in an emergency room setting. Pain scores measured using the Visual Analogue Scale during the procedure were used as the primary outcome assessment. There was no significant difference in pain scores between the forearm and conventional Bier’s block (mean VAS 18.4 SD 22.10 versus 33.7 SD 29.6). No major complications were observed in either group. The forearm-based Bier block is an effective alternative to the conventional block. © 2007, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chong, A. K. S., Tan, D. M. K., Ooi, B. S., Mahadevan, M., Lim, A. Y. T., & Lim, B. H. (2007). Comparison of forearm and conventional bier⇔s blocks for manipulation and reduction of distal radius fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 32(1), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.10.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free