Whole-genome mutational burden analysis of three pluripotency induction methods

104Citations
Citations of this article
208Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is concern that the stresses of inducing pluripotency may lead to deleterious DNA mutations in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines, which would compromise their use for cell therapies. Here we report comparative genomic analysis of nine isogenic iPSC lines generated using three reprogramming methods: integrating retroviral vectors, non-integrating Sendai virus and synthetic mRNAs. We used whole-genome sequencing and de novo genome mapping to identify single-nucleotide variants, insertions and deletions, and structural variants. Our results show a moderate number of variants in the iPSCs that were not evident in the parental fibroblasts, which may result from reprogramming. There were only small differences in the total numbers and types of variants among different reprogramming methods. Most importantly, a thorough genomic analysis showed that the variants were generally benign. We conclude that the process of reprogramming is unlikely to introduce variants that would make the cells inappropriate for therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhutani, K., Nazor, K. L., Williams, R., Tran, H., Dai, H., Dzakula, Z., … Loring, J. F. (2016). Whole-genome mutational burden analysis of three pluripotency induction methods. Nature Communications, 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10536

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free