Instruments of health and harm: How the procurement of healthcare goods contributes to global health inequality

8Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many healthcare goods, such as surgical instruments, textiles and gloves, are manufactured in unregulated factories and sweatshops where, amongst other labour rights violations, workers are subject to considerable occupational health risks. In this paper we undertake an ethical analysis of the supply of sweatshop-produced surgical goods to healthcare providers, with a specific focus on the National Health Service of the United Kingdom. We contend that while labour abuses and occupational health deficiencies are morally unacceptable in the production of any commodity, an additional wrong is incurred when the health of certain populations is secured in ways that endanger the health and well-being of people working and living elsewhere. While some measures have been taken to better regulate the supply chain to healthcare providers in the UK, further action is needed to ensure that surgical goods are sourced from suppliers who protect the labour and occupational health rights of their workers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trueba, M. L., Bhutta, M. F., & Shahvisi, A. (2021, June 1). Instruments of health and harm: How the procurement of healthcare goods contributes to global health inequality. Journal of Medical Ethics. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106286

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free