Resilience in mathematics education research: a systematic review of empirical studies

20Citations
Citations of this article
209Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In recent years, the number of studies examining resilience in relation to mathematics teaching/learning (or mathematical resilience, according to some), increased significantly. This paper is a systematic review of 78 studies published between 2010 and 2021, and investigates (a) conceptualisations of mathematical resilience, (b) demographic characteristics of participants in the papers identified, and (c) factors that influence the development of mathematical resilience. Our analysis indicates that mathematical resilience is conceptualised in two ways: as the coexistence of disadvantage and high mathematical performance; and, as part of one’s mathematical identity. Participants in related studies belong to one of the following categories: disadvantaged pupils; “typical” pupils; disadvantaged university STEM students; “typical” university students; prospective teachers; in-service teachers. Mathematical resilience is found to be influenced by both psychological and social/environmental factors. Finally, we discuss implications and how the field can move forward.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xenofontos, C., & Mouroutsou, S. (2023). Resilience in mathematics education research: a systematic review of empirical studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(7), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2115132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free