Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review

25Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the predictability of narrow-diameter implants as a treatment option in routine clinical practice. A literature review was performed of studies reporting clinical results obtained with these implants. Survival rates, peri-implant bone loss and related complications were evaluated. The working hypothesis was that narrow-diameter implants offer clinical results similar to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. Material and Methods: A Medline-PubMed search covering the period between 2002 and 2012 was carried out. Studies published in English and with a follow-up period of at least 12 months were considered for inclusion. A manual search was also conducted in different journals with an important impact factor. Results: Twenty-one studies meeting the screening criteria were included in the literature review. A total of 2980 narrow-diameter implants placed in 1607 patients were analyzed. Conclusions: The results obtained from the literature indicate that narrow-diameter implants are a predictable treatment option, since they afford clinical results comparable to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. © Medicina Oral S. L.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sierra-Sánchez, J. L., Martínez-González, A., García-Sala Bonmatí, F., Mañes-Ferrer, J. F., & Brotons-Oliver, A. (2014). Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free