Refocusing on the Traditional and Effective Teaching Evaluation: Rational Thoughts About SETEs in Higher Education

1Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Some higher educational institutions often use a student evaluation of teaching effectiveness (SETE) as the only way to evaluate teaching. Unfortunately, this instrument often fails to serve as a tool for improving instruction. It often serves as a disincentive to introducing rigor. Studies have found that student feedback is not enough to be the basis for evaluating teaching. This paper performs a literature review of student evaluations to measure teaching effectiveness. Problems are highlighted, and suggestions are offered to improve SETEs and refocus teaching effectiveness on outcome-based academic standards.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cui, G., Ni, Z., & Wang, C. H. (2022). Refocusing on the Traditional and Effective Teaching Evaluation: Rational Thoughts About SETEs in Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(3), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i3.5086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free