Abstract
Some higher educational institutions often use a student evaluation of teaching effectiveness (SETE) as the only way to evaluate teaching. Unfortunately, this instrument often fails to serve as a tool for improving instruction. It often serves as a disincentive to introducing rigor. Studies have found that student feedback is not enough to be the basis for evaluating teaching. This paper performs a literature review of student evaluations to measure teaching effectiveness. Problems are highlighted, and suggestions are offered to improve SETEs and refocus teaching effectiveness on outcome-based academic standards.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Cui, G., Ni, Z., & Wang, C. H. (2022). Refocusing on the Traditional and Effective Teaching Evaluation: Rational Thoughts About SETEs in Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(3), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i3.5086
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.