Performance comparison among VGG16, InceptionV3, and resnet on galaxy morphology classification

8Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article introduces the structures of three classical convolutional neural networks: VGG16, InceptionV3, and ResNet50, and compares their performance on galaxy morphology classification. The different structures of these networks give them some distinct features, leading to different results. The dataset used was Galaxy10 DECals created by the Galaxy Zoo project. The models were compared in the same way, using one fully-connected layer only without modifying its original architecture, evaluated by accuracy, precision, recall rate, and f1 score. The experimental results show that InceptionV3 gave the best classification results from all aspects. The inception module performs well on the galaxy morphology classification problem.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qian, Y. (2023). Performance comparison among VGG16, InceptionV3, and resnet on galaxy morphology classification. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2580). Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2580/1/012009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free