Abstract
recent study by Middleton et al. (2008; Mar Ecol Prog Ser 371:117-129) characterizing mangrove swamps impounded for mosquito control in Florida has a number of problems that weaken some of the resulting conclusions. We examine some of these issues, which we divide into (1) errors of fact, (2) methodological problems, (3) unwarranted conclusions. Errors of fact include incorrect historical assertions, incorrect site descriptions, and inaccurate statements on the general effects of impoundments. Methodological problems include inadequate sampling for the stated purpose, in particular using results of one-time sampling of very small marsh areas to characterize entire marshes and groups of marshes; defining inadequate controls; use of heterogeneous experimental treatment groups, including highly atypical and unrepresentative sites within experimental treatments; selective sampling; and others. Unwarranted conclusions include the characterization and comparison of marshes and management strategies based upon unrepresentative sampling, and the attribution of differences in habitat function as a result of management strategy without any experimental evidence to suggest such an effect. We make suggestions for mitigating some of these issues. © Inter-Research 2009; www.int-res.com.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rey, J. R., O’Connell, S. M., Carlson, D. B., & Brockmeyer, R. E. (2009). Characteristics of mangrove swamps managed for mosquito control in eastern Florida, USA: A re-examination. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08256
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.