Erratum to: Advantages and psychometric validation of proximal intensive assessments of patient-reported outcomes collected in daily life (Qual Life Res, (2016), 25, (507-516), 10.1007/s11136-015-1170-9)

Eve B. Carlson; Nigel P. Field; Josef I. Ruzek; Richard A. Bryant; Constance J. Dalenberg; Terence M. Keane; David A. Spain

ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Erratum to: Advantages and psychometric validation of proximal intensive assessments of patient-reported outcomes collected in daily life (Qual Life Res, (2016), 25, (507-516), 10.1007/s11136-015-1170-9)

Carlson E
Field N
Ruzek J
et al.

Quality of Life Research

DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1280-z

0Citations

12Readers

Abstract

This article has been published with a spelling error in the first name of one of the co-authors. His name should appear as ”Terence M. Keane“.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carlson, E. B., Field, N. P., Ruzek, J. I., Bryant, R. A., Dalenberg, C. J., Keane, T. M., & Spain, D. A. (2016, September 1). Erratum to: Advantages and psychometric validation of proximal intensive assessments of patient-reported outcomes collected in daily life (Qual Life Res, (2016), 25, (507-516), 10.1007/s11136-015-1170-9). Quality of Life Research. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1280-z

Erratum to: Advantages and psychometric validation of proximal intensive assessments of patient-reported outcomes collected in daily life (Qual Life Res, (2016), 25, (507-516), 10.1007/s11136-015-1170-9)

Abstract

Cite

Register to see more suggestions