Development and Comparison of Predictive Models Based on Different Types of Influencing Factors to Select the Best One for the Prediction of OSAHS Prevalence

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to retrospectively analyze numerous related clinical data to identify three types of potential influencing factors of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) for establishing three predictive nomograms, respectively. The best performing one was screened to guide further clinical decision-making. Methods: Correlation, difference and univariate logistic regression analysis were used to identify the influencing factors of OSAHS. Then these factors are divided into three different types according to the characteristics of the data. Lasso regression was used to filter out three types of factors to construct three nomograms, respectively. Compare the performance of the three nomograms evaluated by C-index, ROC curve and Decision Curve Analysis to select the best one. Two queues were obtained by randomly splitting the whole queue, and similar methods are used to verify the performance of the best nomogram. Results: In total, 8 influencing factors of OSAHS have been identified and divided into three types. Lasso regression finally determined 6, 3 and 4 factors to construct mixed factors nomogram (MFN), baseline factors nomogram (BAFN) and blood factors nomogram (BLFN), respectively. MFN performed best among the three and also performed well in multiple queues. Conclusion: Compared with BAFN and BLFN constructed by single-type factors, MFN constructed by six mixed-type factors shows better performance in predicting the risk of OSAHS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fan, X., He, M., Tong, C., Nie, X., Zhong, Y., & Lu, M. (2022). Development and Comparison of Predictive Models Based on Different Types of Influencing Factors to Select the Best One for the Prediction of OSAHS Prevalence. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.892737

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free