Effect of MR head coil geometry on deep-learning-based MR image reconstruction

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether parallel imaging-imposed geometric coil constraints can be relaxed when using a deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction method as opposed to a traditional non-DL method. Theory and Methods: Traditional and DL-based MR image reconstruction approaches operate in fundamentally different ways: Traditional methods solve a system of equations derived from the image data whereas DL methods use data/target pairs to learn a generalizable reconstruction model. Two sets of head coil profiles were evaluated: (1) 8-channel and (2) 32-channel geometries. A DL model was compared to conjugate gradient SENSE (CG-SENSE) and L1-wavelet compressed sensing (CS) through quantitative metrics and visual assessment as coil overlap was increased. Results: Results were generally consistent between experiments. As coil overlap increased, there was a significant (p < 0.001) decrease in performance in most cases for all methods. The decrease was most pronounced for CG-SENSE, and the DL models significantly outperformed (p < 0.001) their non-DL counterparts in all scenarios. CS showed improved robustness to coil overlap and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) versus CG-SENSE, but had quantitatively and visually poorer reconstructions characterized by blurriness as compared to DL. DL showed virtually no change in performance across SNR and very small changes across coil overlap. Conclusion: The DL image reconstruction method produced images that were robust to coil overlap and of higher quality than CG-SENSE and CS. This suggests that geometric coil design constraints can be relaxed when using DL reconstruction methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dubljevic, N., Moore, S., Lauzon, M. L., Souza, R., & Frayne, R. (2024). Effect of MR head coil geometry on deep-learning-based MR image reconstruction. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 92(4), 1404–1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30130

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free