A SEI Modeling Approach Distinguishing between Capacity and Power Fade

  • Kindermann F
  • Keil J
  • Frank A
  • et al.
100Citations
Citations of this article
146Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

© The Author(s) 2017. Published by ECS. All rights reserved. In this paper we introduce a pseudo two-dimensional (P2D) model for a common lithium-nickel-cobalt-manganese-oxide versus graphite (NCM/graphite) cell with solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) growth as the dominating capacity fade mechanism on the anode and active material dissolution as the main aging mechanism on the cathode. The SEI implementation considers a growth due to non-ideal insulation properties during calendar as well as cyclic aging and a re-formation after cyclic cracking of the layer during graphite expansion. Additionally, our approach distinguishes between an electronic (σSEI) and an ionic (κSEI) conductivity of the SEI. This approach introduces the possibility to adapt the model to capacity as well as power fade. Simulation data show good agreement with an experimental aging study for NCM/graphite cells at different temperatures introduced in literature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kindermann, F. M., Keil, J., Frank, A., & Jossen, A. (2017). A SEI Modeling Approach Distinguishing between Capacity and Power Fade. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 164(12), E287–E294. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0321712jes

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free