Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols on surgical site wound infection rates in urological procedures

1Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This meta-analysis assesses the impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols on surgical site wound infections (SSWIs) in urological procedures. Analysing data from 10 studies, our focus was on SSWI rates on the third and seventh postoperative days. The results reveal a significant reduction in SSWI rates for patients managed under ERAS protocols compared with traditional care. Notably, Figure 4 demonstrates a substantial decrease in SSWI on the third day (I2 = 93%; random: standardized mean difference [SMD]: −6.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −7.42 to −5.05, p < 0.01), and Figure 5 mirrors this trend on the seventh day (I2 = 95%; random: SMD: −4.72, 95% CI: −6.28 to −3.16, p < 0.01). These findings underscore the effectiveness of ERAS protocols in minimizing early postoperative wound infections, emphasizing their importance for broader implementation in urological surgeries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cai, Y., Cai, X., Zhang, X., Zhu, J., & Chen, W. (2024, January 1). Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols on surgical site wound infection rates in urological procedures. International Wound Journal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14582

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free