Comparing palliative treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma: photodynamic therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation

20Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Referral to an endoscopist is often done once curative resection is no longer an option for cholangiocarcinoma management. In such cases, palliation has become the main objective of the treatment. Photodynamic therapy and radiofrequency ablation can be performed to achieve palliation, with both procedures associated with improved stent patency and survival. Despite the greatly increased cost and association with photosensitivity, photodynamic therapy allows transmission to the entire biliary tree. In contrast, radiofrequency ablation is cheaper and faster to apply, but requires intraductal contact. This paper reviews both modalities and compares their efficacy and safety for bile duct cancer palliation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohammad, T., & Kahaleh, M. (2022, May 1). Comparing palliative treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma: photodynamic therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation. Clinical Endoscopy. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.274

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free