Mitigating Moral Injury for Palliative Care Clinicians

10Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Palliative care clinicians (PCCs) in the United States face the combination of increasing burnout and a growing need for their services based on demographic changes and an increasing burden of serious illness. In addition to efforts to increase the number of PCCs and to train other clinicians in ‘‘primary palliative skills,’’ we must address the burnout in the field to address the growing gap between need for this care and capacity to provide it. To address burnout in PCCs, we must develop solutions with the unique contributors to burnout in this field in mind. PCCs are particularly susceptible to moral distress and moral injury faced by all clinicians, and these states are inextricably linked to burnout. We propose three solutions to address moral distress and moral injury in PCCs to reduce burnout. These solutions are grounded in the dilemmas particular to palliative care and in best evidence: first, to create space for PCCs to confront moral challenges head-on; second, to integrate ethics consultations into care of some patients cared for by PCCs; and third, to reassess care models for PCCs. These approaches can mitigate burnout and thus address the growing gap in our ability to provide high-quality palliative care for those patients in need.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pereira, A. G., Linzer, M., & Berry, L. L. (2023). Mitigating Moral Injury for Palliative Care Clinicians. Palliative Medicine Reports, 4(1), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2022.0062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free