Abstract
The authors apologise for some errors in the published article. The corrections are as follows: In Table 4: For the outcome `Depression', effect size 0.12 should read -0.12 Confidence interval 0.04, -0.56 should read 0.04, 0.56 (also reported in the text on page 22) Confidence interval 0.12, -0.42 should read 0.12, 0.42 Confidence interval 0.07, -0.37 should read 0.07, 0.37 Confidence interval -0.17, -0.29 should read -0.17, 0.29 Confidence interval -0.07, -1.11 should read -0.07, 1.11 (also reported in the text on page 26) Reported in the text on page 26 of the article: Confidence interval 0.09, -0.83 should read 0.09, 0.83 The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Prothero, L., Barley, E., Galloway, J., Georgopoulou, S., & Sturt, J. (2020, July 1). Corrigendum: “The evidence base for psychological interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review of reviews” (International Journal of Nursing Studies (2018) 82 (20–29), (S0020748918300592), (10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.03.008)). International Journal of Nursing Studies. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103581
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.