A dedicated fungal culture medium is useful in the diagnosis of fungemia: A retrospective cross-sectional study

12Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Mortality for candidemia ranges from 15% to 35%. Current guidelines recommend inoculating blood into three aerobic and three anaerobic blood culture bottles when candidemia is suspected, without mention of a fungal blood culture bottle. Objective: To determine the value of the BACTEC Myco/F Lytic blood culture media in the diagnosis of fungemia. Methods: A two-year retrospective cross-sectional study was performed for patients who had fungemia with submitted BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F (Aer), BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F (Anaer) or Myco/F Lytic (Myco) blood culture bottles. Results: The detection rate of fungemia was 77.4% in 93 patients with contemporaneously submitted blood culture bottles when limited to only Aer/Anaer culture results. The detection rate improved significantly with the addition of the Myco culture bottle results (p<0.0001). A logistic regression model showed that Myco culture bottle submissions were less useful for patients with appropriate anti-fungal therapy administered within 48 hours [OR = 0.18, 95% CI = (0.06, 0.49), p = 0.001] and those with fungal growth detected within 48 hours [OR = 0.33, 95% CI = (0.12, 0.89), p = 0.001]. Among a subset of patients with concordant blood culture results, those with Myco culture bottles submission allowed earlier fungal detection and speciation by at least one day in 27.5% and 25.0% of the cases respectively. Conclusion: Our study highlights the importance of a dedicated fungal blood culture when fungemia is clinically suspected. Nearly a quarter of fungemias may be missed if a fungal blood culture is not performed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zheng, S., Ng, T. Y., Li, H., Tan, A. L., Tan, T. T., & Tan, B. H. (2016). A dedicated fungal culture medium is useful in the diagnosis of fungemia: A retrospective cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164668

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free