ELISA IgM para diagnóstico de leptospirose: Revisão sistemática e meta-análise

38Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used. Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively. In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rosa, M. I., dos Reis, M. F., Simon, C., Dondossola, E., Alexandre, M. C., Colonetti, T., & Meller, F. O. (2017, December 1). ELISA IgM para diagnóstico de leptospirose: Revisão sistemática e meta-análise. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva. Associacao Brasileira de Pos - Graduacao em Saude Coletiva. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320172212.14112016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free