The history of registered sickness absence predicts future sickness absence

67Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The history of sickness absence has been found to predict future sickness absence. Aims: To establish the review period of historical sickness absence data that is needed to predict future sickness absence. Methods: The individual number of days and episodes of sickness absence were ascertained for 762 hospital employees from 2004 to 2008 inclusive. Past sickness absence was included stepwise in ordinal regression models. The explained variance of the ordinal regression models reflected the extent to which future sickness absence could be predicted and was expressed in percentages calculated as Nagelkerke's pseudo R2 × 100%. Results: A total of 551 employees (72%) had complete data and were eligible for regression analysis. Days of sickness absence in the past year predicted up to 15% of future days of sickness absence. Adding the sickness absence data of the past 2 or 3 years did not further increase the predictability of days of sickness absence. Episodes of sickness absence in the past year predicted up to 25% of future episodes of sickness absence. The predictability of episodes of sickness absence increased to 30% when the past 2 years of sickness absence were included in the regression model, but did not further increase when sickness absence of the past 3 years was included. Conclusions: Employees who are more likely to have an above average sickness absence can be identified from their history of sickness absence in the past 2 years. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roelen, C. A. M., Koopmans, P. C., Schreuder, J. A. H., Anema, J. R., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). The history of registered sickness absence predicts future sickness absence. Occupational Medicine, 61(2), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq181

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free