Laws mandating coprescription of naloxone and their impact on naloxone prescription in five US states, 2014-2018

66Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives. To examine early impacts of laws that require naloxone to be prescribed to patients at increased overdose risk. Methods. Using data from 2014 to 2018 from a large pharmacy chain, CVS Pharmacy, we examined the effects of naloxone-prescribing mandates 90 days before and after they took effect in Arizona, Florida, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia. We compared the number of naloxone doses initiated directly by prescribers and by pharmacy standing order, prescriber specialty, pharmacies dispensing, and payor type by applying linear models and the c2 test. Results. Naloxone-prescribing mandates increased pharmacy naloxone provision 255% from 90 days before to after implementation. This approach appeared to engage more prescribers (1028 before to 4285 after), complement ongoing naloxone provision under pharmacy standing orders, expand geographic reach (from 40% to 80% of pharmacies dispensing), and broaden the naloxone payor mix in 4 (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Green, T. C., Davis, C., Xuan, Z., Walley, A. Y., & Bratberg, J. (2020, June 1). Laws mandating coprescription of naloxone and their impact on naloxone prescription in five US states, 2014-2018. American Journal of Public Health. American Public Health Association Inc. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305620

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free