To be or not to be like Iceland? (Ontological) Politics of comparison in Greenlandic tourism development

6Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, we introduce the concept of politics of comparison in tourism development, looking at how comparison contributes to shaping and making sense of tourism development in Greenland. Decision makers and operators in Greenland foresee tourism growth as new transatlantic airports are set to open by 2024. To navigate an uncertain tourism future, many look towards neighbouring Iceland, who experienced exponential growth in international tourism arrivals between 2010 and 2018. In this North Atlantic reflection, comparison also works as a tool to understand tourism, positioning Greenland as a potential destination and deliberating about the future of tourism in the region, while also bringing forth competing logics and trajectories of development. Thus, comparison serves to engage with the meaning and value of tourism, seeing it not only as a pillar of the economy but also as a force affecting landscapes and communities. We argue that the comparisons made by tourism actors work epistemologically - creating knowledge of 'what is' - as well as ontologically, forcefully interfering with and producing tourism realities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ren, C., & Jóhannesson, G. T. (2023). To be or not to be like Iceland? (Ontological) Politics of comparison in Greenlandic tourism development. Polar Record, 59(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247422000328

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free