Abstract
The numerical model employed in this study uses an implicit differencing technique, which is stable for large time steps. The numerical instability that would have destroyed Richardson's barotropic forecast, had it been extended, is therby circumvented. It is sometimes said that computational instability was the cause of the failure of Richardon's baroclinic forecast, for which he obtained a pressure tendency value two orders of magnitude too large. However, the initial tendency is independent of the time step (at least for the explicit scheme used by Richardson). In fact, the spurious tendency resulted from the presence of unrealistically large high-frequency gravity-wave components in the initial fields. -from Author
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lynch, P. (1992). Richardson’s barotropic forecast: a reappraisal. Bulletin - American Meteorological Society, 73(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1992)073<0035:RBFAR>2.0.CO;2
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.