Longitudinal changes in peripapillary atrophy in the ocular hypertension treatment study: A case-control assessment

22Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the association between peripapillary atrophy (PPA) area and conversion from ocular hypertension (OHT) to glaucoma. Design: Prospective, longitudinal cohort study of cases and controls. Participants: We included 279 age-matched and follow-up time-matched eyes with OHT that converted to glaucoma and 279 eyes with OHT that did not convert to glaucoma. Methods: Initial and last acceptable optic disc photos were analyzed. Disc, α-zone, and β-zone PPA were traced independently by 2 trained readers and their areas were measured with Photoshop. The α-zone and β-zone areas were expressed as a percentage of optic disc area. Main Outcome Measures: α-Zone and β-zone PPA size over time. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) demonstrated that readers had good agreement on disc area (ICC = 0.97) and β-zone (ICC = 0.82), but not α-zone (ICC = 0.48). The β-zone, as a percentage of disc area, increased in size (P < 0.001) in both eyes with incident primary open-angle glaucoma (mean, 10.6%; standard deviation, 22.6%) and matched controls (mean, 10.1%; standard deviation, 33.7) over follow-up (mean, 12.3 years). The increase in size did not differ between cases and controls (P = 0.82). Enlargement of the β-zone was not correlated with follow-up time (P = 0.39). Conclusions: The results did not show a difference in size of the β-zone at baseline between eyes that proceed to develop glaucoma and those that do not. Moreover, the β-zone enlarges equally in case and control eyes during follow-up.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Savatovsky, E., Mwanza, J. C., Budenz, D. L., Feuer, W. J., Vandenbroucke, R., Schiffman, J. C., & Anderson, D. R. (2015). Longitudinal changes in peripapillary atrophy in the ocular hypertension treatment study: A case-control assessment. Ophthalmology, 122(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free