Analysis of the Accuracy of CAM-type Deformity Resection on a Low-cost Arthroscopic Simulator in a Training Scenario

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective To evaluate surgeons performance in resecting CAM-type deformities using a realistic arthroscopic surgery simulator. Methods An arthroscopic simulator was created using low-cost materials with the help of a GTMax Core A1 3D printer and the programs Invesalius and Meshmixer 2017, which were used to develop femoral head parts in ABS material, with the presence of a CAMtype deformity, to mimic a femoroacetabular impact situation. After the operations were performed by 16 surgeons, the femurs were compared to a previous model with deformity and another without, using Cloudcompare, and parameters such as the volumetric difference between the operated femurs, with and without deformity, the minimum and maximum distance between them, the percentage of the deformity resected, the estimated time for total resection of the deformity, as well as a qualitative analysis based on the images and graphs provided by the program representing the areas of the parts resected, were evaluated at the end. Results The average resection speed was 34.66mm3/min (SD = 46mm3/min, max =147.33; min = -2.66). The average resection rate was 26.2% (SD = 34.7%, max = 111; Min = -2). Qualitative analysis showed hyporesection of deformities and sometimes hyperresection of nondeformed areas. The simulator was highly rated by the surgeons, with a tactile sensation very similar to real surgery, according to them. Conclusion Arthroscopic simulators have proved very useful in training less experienced surgeons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Souza, B. G. S. E., Vieira, V. H., Miranda, M., Carvalho, L. G. V. A. D., Bastos, F. D. S., & Boas, J. V. D. V. (2024). Analysis of the Accuracy of CAM-type Deformity Resection on a Low-cost Arthroscopic Simulator in a Training Scenario. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, 59(3), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1785666

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free