Impact of the Genetics and Source of Preclinical Safety Animal Models on Study Design, Results, and Interpretation

23Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It has been long established that not only the species but also the strain and supplier of rodents used in preclinical safety studies can have a significant impact on the outcome of studies due to variability in their genetic background and thus spontaneous pathologic findings. In addition, local husbandry, housing, and other environmental conditions may have effects on the development and expression of comorbidities, particularly in longer-term or chronic studies. More recently, similar effects related to the source, including genetic and environmental variability, have been recognized in cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis). The increased use of cynomolgus macaques from various sources of captive-bred animals (including nonnative, U.S./European Union-based breeding facilities or colonies) can affect study design and study results and outcome. It is important to acknowledge and understand the impact of this variability on the results and interpretation of research studies. This review includes recent examples where variability of preclinical animal models (rats and monkeys) affected the postmortem observations highlighting its relevance to study design or interpretation in safety studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Colman, K. (2017, January 1). Impact of the Genetics and Source of Preclinical Safety Animal Models on Study Design, Results, and Interpretation. Toxicologic Pathology. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623316672743

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free