Extending the range of constant strain rate nanoindentation testing

29Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Constant strain rate nanoindentation hardness measurements at high sustained strain rates cannot be made in conventional nanoindentation testing systems using the commonly employed continuous stiffness measurement technique (CSM) because of the plasticity error recently reported by Merle et al. [Acta Mater.134, 167 (2017)]. To circumvent this problem, here we explore an alternative testing and analysis procedure based on quasi-static loading and an independent knowledge of the Young's modulus, which is easily obtained by standard nanoindentation testing. In theory, the method applies to any indentation strain rate, but in practice, an upper limit on the rate arises from hardware limitations in the testing system. The new methodology is developed and applied to measurements made with an iMicro nanoindenter (KLA, Inc.), in which strain rates up to 100 s-1 were successfully achieved. The origins of the hardware limitations are documented and discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Merle, B., Higgins, W. H., & Pharr, G. M. (2020). Extending the range of constant strain rate nanoindentation testing. Journal of Materials Research, 35(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2019.408

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free