The Institutional Tragedy of Pandemic Triage Regulation in Italy and Germany

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article adopts a comparative approach exploring the reactions to the scarcity of resources resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic in Italy and Germany. Both countries showed a fragmented structure including individual hospitals, medical associations and recommendatory interdisciplinary bodies, such as ethics councils. Against this background, the authors use the different constitutional frameworks in which the healthcare systems are embedded to assess the legitimacy of the intervention by non-legislative bodies. It is demonstrated that, in both jurisdictions, a certain level of parliamentary involvement in establishing triage criteria or procedures is constitutionally required, as in situations of extreme scarcity the prioritisation decision cannot be determined by a mere clinical analysis but rather demands a normative choice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Domenici, I., & Engeser, F. (2022). The Institutional Tragedy of Pandemic Triage Regulation in Italy and Germany. European Journal of Health Law, 29(1), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-BJA10069

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free