Impact of Adherence to Quality Measures for Localized Prostate Cancer on Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction, and Treatment-related Complications

12Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and Objective: Quality measures used in pay-forperformance systems are intended to address specific quality goals, such as safety, efficiency, effectiveness, timeliness, equity, and patient-centeredness. Given the small number of narrowly focused measures in prostate cancer care, we sought to determine whether adherence to any of the available payer-driven quality measures influences patient-centered outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL), patient satisfaction, and treatment-related complications. Methods: The Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation study is a population-based, prospective cohort study that enrolled 3708 men with clinically localized prostate cancer during 2011 and 2012, of whom 2601 completed the 1-year survey and underwent complete chart abstraction. Compliance with 6 quality indicators endorsed by national consortia was assessed. Multivariable regression was used to determine the relationship between indicator compliance and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC- 26) instrument summary scores, satisfaction scale scores (service satisfaction scale for cancer care), and treatment-related complications. Results: Overall rates of compliance with these quality measures ranged between 64% and 88%. Three of the 6 measures were weakly associated with 1-year sexual function and bowel function scores (β = -4.6, 1.69, and 2.93, respectively; P ≤ 0.05), whereas the remaining measures had no significant relationship with patientreported HRQOL outcomes. Satisfaction scores and treatment-related complications were not associated with quality measure compliance. Conclusions: Compliance with available nationally endorsed quality indicators, which were designed to incentivize effective and efficient care, was not associated with clinically important changes in patient-centered outcomes (HRQOL, satisfaction, or complications) within 1-year.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sohn, W., Resnick, M. J., Greenfield, S., Kaplan, S. H., Phillips, S., Koyama, T., … Barocas, D. A. (2016). Impact of Adherence to Quality Measures for Localized Prostate Cancer on Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction, and Treatment-related Complications. Medical Care, 54(8), 738–744. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000562

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free