Expanding Citizen Science: Community Action Without Primary Data Collection

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Environmental planning disputes often combine questions of regulation and legislation with distinctive, place-based epistemic issues that lend themselves to citizen science approaches. Whilst these citizen science activities often concern the enforcement of regulations, here we describe the attempts of a local community group to prevent the start-up of a new biomass incineration plant by showing that it fails to comply with the relevant regulations and/or that the associated legislation has not been applied correctly. Through documentary sources and in-depth interviews, we examine the ways in which the group’s work has parallels with aspects of regulatory science. In describing this work, and thinking about how to categorise it, we argue that conceptions of citizen science need to be broadened to include a wider range of activities than the traditional focus on primary data collection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Evans, R., Hacking, N., & Lewis, J. (2023). Expanding Citizen Science: Community Action Without Primary Data Collection. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.503

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free