In vitro performance of a new non-invasive extracorporeal saturation monitor

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A simulated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit was constructed in the laboratory to compare the accuracy and precision of a new non-invasive extracorporeal oxygen saturation monitor - the M3 monitor (Spectrum Medical LLP, Gloucester, UK) against the Siemens RAPIDLab® blood gas analyser (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). Comparisons were made across a range of oxygen saturations and at different temperatures and different haemoglobin concentrations. Results showed that under all conditions, when recording oxygen saturation, the M3 monitor achieved a mean (SD) bias of -0.9 (1.7)% with limits of clinical agreement of -4.2 to 2.5. However, the difference between the two monitors was larger at lower saturation levels (p < 0.001), lower haemoglobin levels (p = 0.002) and lower temperatures (p = 0.013). The mean (SD) haemoglobin concentration was 15.4 (0.6) when recorded by the M3 monitor, compared to 15.4 (0.5) g.dl -1 measured by the blood gas analyser The M3 monitor compares favourably with the gold standard of the blood gas analyser and has the advantage of giving a continuous reading. © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bailey, D. H., Da Silva, E. J., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2011). In vitro performance of a new non-invasive extracorporeal saturation monitor. Anaesthesia, 66(10), 889–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06801.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free