Abstract
A simulated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit was constructed in the laboratory to compare the accuracy and precision of a new non-invasive extracorporeal oxygen saturation monitor - the M3 monitor (Spectrum Medical LLP, Gloucester, UK) against the Siemens RAPIDLab® blood gas analyser (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). Comparisons were made across a range of oxygen saturations and at different temperatures and different haemoglobin concentrations. Results showed that under all conditions, when recording oxygen saturation, the M3 monitor achieved a mean (SD) bias of -0.9 (1.7)% with limits of clinical agreement of -4.2 to 2.5. However, the difference between the two monitors was larger at lower saturation levels (p < 0.001), lower haemoglobin levels (p = 0.002) and lower temperatures (p = 0.013). The mean (SD) haemoglobin concentration was 15.4 (0.6) when recorded by the M3 monitor, compared to 15.4 (0.5) g.dl -1 measured by the blood gas analyser The M3 monitor compares favourably with the gold standard of the blood gas analyser and has the advantage of giving a continuous reading. © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bailey, D. H., Da Silva, E. J., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2011). In vitro performance of a new non-invasive extracorporeal saturation monitor. Anaesthesia, 66(10), 889–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06801.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.