In between spaces: How proximity and distance in cities are changing through the sharing economy

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The article examines whether and how the sharing economy, as a specific, non-exclusive practice of owning and using property objects, reproduces but also irritates and redevelops urban spatial and social relationships. To this end, it applies a methodological framework of analysis that, based on Georg Simmel and conceptually following Hartmut Rosa, examines phenomena and practices of sharing with regard to the relationships entered into with things, with others, as well as with oneself. Drawing on Simmel, a distinction is made between the private and the public as spheres in which proximity and distance are simultaneously practically negotiated and institutionally anchored from a spatial and social point of view. Property and its usage—alone or together with others—play a central role here, because spatial structures are formed and maintained, but can also change, depending on specific property objects and their particular use. Based on own empirical findings on the shared use of living space (homesharing) and vehicles (carsharing), the article examines what impact sharing practices have on proximity and distance relationships and thus on the (re)structuring of spaces within cities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oberthür, J., Henning, C., Janzing, M., Katzer, H., & Bönnighausen, H. (2024). In between spaces: How proximity and distance in cities are changing through the sharing economy. Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie, 34(4), 551–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-025-00545-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free