Clinical trial transparency regulations: Implications to various scholarly publishing stakeholders

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As thousands of 2019 Corona virus disease (Covid-19) clinical trials are continuously getting added to various registries these days, good practices on data sharing and transparency have become one of the prime topics of discussion than ever before. Although trial registration is considered a crucial step, there is a lack of integration between registration and published literature. Trial outcomes are a matter of public interest, but sponsor compliances are not adequate with the recommended guidelines. Although the global recognition of data transparency increases day by day, there is still a long journey to travel. It is high time that scholarly publishing stakeholders should put in a collaborative effort to check author compliance. In this article, we aimed to comprehend and discuss the imperative roles of various scholarly publishing stakeholders in improving clinical trial transparency during this pandemic situation and highlight the changing paradigm towards the pressing need for reporting clinical trial data more effectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Razack, H. I. A., Aranjani, J. M., & Mathew, S. T. (2022). Clinical trial transparency regulations: Implications to various scholarly publishing stakeholders. Science and Public Policy, 49(6), 951–961. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free