The Indifference of Transport: Comparative Research of “Infrastructural Ruins” in the Gauteng City‐Region and Greater Maputo

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

States in the Global South have consistently invested in large‐scale, vanity infrastructure projects, which are often not used by the majority of their residents. Using a mixed‐method and comparative approach with findings from Greater Maputo, Mozambique, and the Gauteng City‐Region exposes how internationally‐supported and expensive transport projects do not meet the needs of lower‐income urban residents, and meanwhile, widespread, everyday modes of commuting such as trains, paratransit, and pathways for walking deteriorate. State‐led development thus often generates an infrastructural landscape characterised by “ruin” and “indifference.” These choices are anachronistic, steeped in a desire for a modernist‐inspired future and in establishing narratives of control. In the cases of Gauteng and Maputo, whether or not the infrastructure is “successfully” implemented, these choices have resulted in a distancing of the state from the majority of urban residents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rubin, M., Howe, L. B., Charlton, S., Suleman, M., Cani, A., Tshuwa, L., & Parker, A. (2023). The Indifference of Transport: Comparative Research of “Infrastructural Ruins” in the Gauteng City‐Region and Greater Maputo. Urban Planning, 8(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i4.7264

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free