Abstract
Research confirms that interdemocratic conflicts are more likely to be resolved peacefully. However, do the usual results hold up for especially contentious issues such as territory? We use issue correlates of war (ICOW) data from 1816 to 1992 to build on Hensel (2001) and related studies to investigate the relationships between and among democracy, conflict management, and territory as an issue. The results create a puzzle for the democratic or neo-Kantian peace: When territory is at stake, issue-related variables come to the fore and matter more than regime type in explaining states' settlement strategies. The most important finding is that war experience between adversaries increases the likelihood of peaceful resolution, but decreases that of militarized disputes. © 2006 International Studies Association.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
James, P., Park, J., & Choi, S. W. (2006). Democracy and conflict management: Territorial claims in the western hemisphere revisited. International Studies Quarterly, 50(4), 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00426.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.