Listening preference for child-directed speech versus time-reversed speech in moderate-preterm infants compared to full-term infants

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to examine whether there is a listening preference for child-directed speech (CDS) over backward speech in moderate-preterm infants (MPIs). Method: Eighteen MPIs of gestational age of 32.0 weeks (range: 32- 34.06 weeks), chronological age of 8.09 months, and maturation age of 6.48 months served as the experimental group. The two control groups con-sisted of a total of 36 infants—20 full-term infants matched for chronological age and 16 full-term infants matched for maturation age. The infants were tested using the central fixation procedure and were presented with 16 trials of CDS and backward speech. A follow-up was conducted 5 years after the initial experiment using a developmental and a five-item parent questionnaire. Results: MPIs did not demonstrate a preference for CDS over backward speech, whereas both control groups demonstrated a listening preference for CDS over backward speech. MPIs showed a delayed use of first words and word combinations and lower scores on the five-item questionnaire compared to term infants. Twelve MPIs (67%) did not demonstrate a preference for CDS over backward speech. Four of them (33%) were later diagnosed with neurode-velopmental disorders. Conclusions: The lack of preference for CDS over backward speech in the MPIs group suggests delayed developmental pattern of speech processing compared to full-term peers. Delays in neurological maturation as well as listen-ing experience in an unregulated environment outside the uterus during a sensi-tive period of brain development may affect the recognition of phonological and prosodic patterns that support listening preference for speech over backward speech.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Segal, O., & Moyal, D. (2024). Listening preference for child-directed speech versus time-reversed speech in moderate-preterm infants compared to full-term infants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 67(3), 900–916. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free