Mechanical and Electrical Comparative Studies of Widely Utilized Solar Perovskite Thin Films via Scanning Probe Microscopy

9Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Most perovskite publications explore only one or two perovskite formulas to achieve good performance and/or stability. In contrary, this work aims to provide fair comparisons among different popularized perovskite recipes (MAPbI3, FAPbI3, FA0.1MA0.9PbI3, Cs0.2FA0.8PbI2.25Br0.75, Cs0.05FA0.81MA0.14PbI2.55Br0.45, and (PEA)2MA39Pb40I121) on the basis of mechanical and electrical properties together with deformation and stability via force curve analysis, photoconductive atomic force microscopy (c-AFM), Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM), and Raman spectroscopy. Using the c-AFM approach together with cantilever-sample interaction, the nanoscale Young’s modulus, adhesion force, and photogenerated current mapping with and without reverse bias potential of the six distinct perovskites are investigated. Sheet resistance and hardness test results further expand thin films’ physical comprehension, relating to future applications in flexible electronics. Additionally, the work function distributions of perovskites are explored via KPFM. Surface terminations, along with lattice contraction and octahedral tilting, cause changes in work function. Lastly, c-AFM was used to investigate the charge-morphology evolution under heat treatment. Triple-cation perovskites present themselves as the most robust system by striking the right balance between structural deformation and cationic rotation, with good current stability under heat and high resistance to plastic deformation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pansa-Ngat, P., Kamnoedmanee, S., Semapet, N., Sinthiptharakoon, K., Suwanchawalit, C., Burimart, S., … Kanjanaboos, P. (2024). Mechanical and Electrical Comparative Studies of Widely Utilized Solar Perovskite Thin Films via Scanning Probe Microscopy. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 7(8), 3234–3244. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.3c03236

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free