Maximum Likelihood Estimates of the Accuracy of Four Diagnostic Techniques

9Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study examined the sensitivities and specificities of four diagnostic techniques used in psychiatry; the clinical interview, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS), the Psychiatric Diagnostic Interview (PDI), and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI). Subjects consisted of 207 patients drawn from in- and out-patient units, and 32 people from a correctional institution. A maximum likelihood estimation approach was used to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of each instrument. It was found that no one technique was clearly superior to the others. The psychometric properties were highly dependent upon the diagnosis. It was concluded that structured interview schedules are preferred for making diagnoses, but that further development of them is necessary. Self-report scales may be most useful in the description and prediction of individual's behaviors in different situations. © 1990, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Streiner, D. L., & Miller, H. R. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimates of the Accuracy of Four Diagnostic Techniques. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50(3), 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164490503023

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free