The role of nerve transfers in chronic nerve compression syndromes

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Compression neuropathy is a common problem that results in impaired axonal conduction, and with time, numbness, tingling and weakness from muscle atrophy. Supercharge reverse end-to-side (SETS) nerve transfers have emerged as a novel approach to augment function in chronic nerve compression syndromes with minimal donor site morbidity. This review answers the question, “What are the indications, surgical techniques, and nuances of SETS nerve transfers for ulnar, axillary, radial, and femoral compression neuropathies?”. Methods: This article reviews current literature and technical components of the use of SETS in chronic nerve compression syndromes. Results: SETS nerve transfers improve functional outcomes and reduce disability in chronic nerve compression syndromes with limited donor site morbidity. SETS nerve transfers for ulnar, axillary, and femoral compressive neuropathy improve muscle strength, as demonstrated by increased MRC scores. It has also been shown that SETS transfers decrease clawing in ulnar nerve compression and pain in axillary nerve compression. More research is needed for SETS transfers for radial nerve compression neuropathies. Conclusion: SETs nerve transfers have emerged as a novel approach to restore function and reduce pain and dysfunction in chronic nerve compression syndromes. SETS nerve transfers have minimal donor site morbidity and improve the strength and function of muscles innervated by the effected “recipient” nerve. This review explores the indications and surgical techniques of SETS nerve transfers for ulnar, axillary, radial, and femoral compression neuropathies as well as their reported outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kennedy, P. J., Nag, S., Otto-Moudry, R., & Moore, A. M. (2025). The role of nerve transfers in chronic nerve compression syndromes. International Orthopaedics, 49(4), 881–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06434-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free