Abstract
"6 We should bear in mind that these countries depend to various extents on Western markets for their exports, be they energy or goods. [...]a statement on the "U.S., European, and Japanese share of global income (being) projected to fall from 56 percent today to well under half by 2030" must be balanced with a general overview of some of the limitations of the BRICS.7 They are facing severe internal imbalances and disparities, such as GDP per capita distribution; the stages of development of their internal provinces, regions, and states (in areas like infrastructure, health care, living standards, etc.); and a medium to high potential for internal conflict on ethnic, religious, territorial, social, and democracy-related grounds. [...]in a multipolar, polycentric, multimodal, or even multiplex world, both the U.S. and Europe would, by definition, lose a part of their influence on world affairs, and as a consequence they would find themselves in a position of increased dependence on each other, mutually reinforcing, based on their shared history, values, and-hopefully-vision, interests, and trust, addressing challenges that we cannot deal with separately, such as climate change, changes in global governance, cyber (in)security, and so on.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Iordan, C. (2013). The Transatlantic Relation in Times of Multipolarity: European Security Implications. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 13(1), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.11610/connections.13.1.02
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.