Whistling Through the COVID-19 Pandemic: Optimism Bias and Political Beliefs in the United States

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Utilizing a nationally representative survey of Americans from December 2020, we consider the degree to which COVID-19 risk perceptions are related to political factors. We examine the likelihood that one believes they will be infected with COVID-19, the likelihood that a peer will be infected, and the difference between the individual and peer perceived risks, known as optimism bias, and compare these perceptions across partisan characteristics. Results show that Trump voting category is the most important contributor to perceived COVID-19 risks. We find similar partisan differences as prior research, note that these differences persisted through the end of 2020, despite the post-Thanksgiving surge with high and growing rates of COVID in all regions of the United States. Contrary to prior expectations, partisanship does not strongly predict the level of optimism bias, as both assessed personal and general health risks track closely with one another by both political party and ideology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wolaver, A., & Doces, J. (2022). Whistling Through the COVID-19 Pandemic: Optimism Bias and Political Beliefs in the United States. American Politics Research, 50(3), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X211055043

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free