Comparison of Learning Outcomes for Simulation-based and Traditional Inference Curricula in a Designed Educational Experiment

  • Maurer K
  • Lock D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The focus of the following study is to make a formal comparison of learning outcomes under the traditional and simulation-based inference curricula. The learning outcomes for concepts surrounding inference with confidence intervals and hypothesis testing are of primary interest. A randomized experiment was conducted to administer the two curricula to students in an in- troductory statistics course. The experimental design allows for causal inference to be drawn about the effect of curriculum type on the learning outcomes. The results indicate that signifi- cant improvement in learning outcomes for confidence interval related topics are achieved using the simulation-based teaching methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maurer, K., & Lock, D. (2016). Comparison of Learning Outcomes for Simulation-based and Traditional Inference Curricula in a Designed Educational Experiment. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/t591026161

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free