MODERNISM, NOMINALISM, AND THE HIDDEN GOD IN SAMUEL BECKETT, WALLACE STEVENS, AND DAVID JONES

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The idea that human language is an inherently inadequate instrument for grasping reality is widespread in modernist literature. While the 'radical nominalism' of this position has been recognised, this article argues that a genealogical understanding of its theological roots in medieval nominalism can highlight how modernist writers like Samuel Beckett and Wallace Stevens still wrestle with a voluntarist God of absolute and arbitrary power. By contrast, for a writer like David Jones, the historical choice of nominalism amounts to a theological mistake, and the modern artist needs to rediscover a God who consecrates and redeems the human capacity for sign-making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tonning, E. (2023). MODERNISM, NOMINALISM, AND THE HIDDEN GOD IN SAMUEL BECKETT, WALLACE STEVENS, AND DAVID JONES. Literature and Theology, 37(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/frac034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free