Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels' greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum

140Citations
Citations of this article
183Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The global warming intensities of crop-based biofuels and fossil fuels differ not only in amount but also in their discharge patterns over time. Early discharges, for example, from market-mediated land use change, will have created more global warming by any time in the future than later discharges, owing to the slow decay of atmospheric CO2. A spreadsheet model of this process, BTIME, captures this important time pattern effect using the Bern CO2 decay model to allow fuels to be compared for policy decisions on the basis of their real warming effects with a variety of user-supplied parameter values. The model also allows economic discounting of climate effects extended far into the future. Compared to approaches that simply sum greenhouse gas emissions over time, recognizing the physics of atmospheric CO2 decay significantly increases the deficit relative to fossil fuel of any biofuel causing land use change. © 2009 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Hare, M., Plevin, R. J., Martin, J. I., Jones, A. D., Kendall, A., & Hopson, E. (2009). Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels’ greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum. Environmental Research Letters, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free