Complementary and alternative treatments of multiple sclerosis: A review of the evidence from 2001 to 2016

40Citations
Citations of this article
164Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) commonly use complementary and alternative medicines (CAM), but an understanding of their efficacy is lacking. Here, we quantitatively review the class I and class II studies of treatment efficacy for multiple sclerosis from January 2001 to January 2017, in order to assess the modern evidence for CAM use. The 38 studies included in this review are divided across five CAM types (cannabis, diet, exercise, psychological approaches and other). We found little evidence to support CAM efficacy. The studies contained little replication in intervention, primary outcomes or study design. Six of 16 CAMs included in this review were only researched in a single study. Future work in this area should build consensus around study methodologies and primary outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Claflin, S. B., Van Der Mei, I. A. F., & Taylor, B. V. (2018, January 1). Complementary and alternative treatments of multiple sclerosis: A review of the evidence from 2001 to 2016. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2016-314490

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free