Is premedication necessary for outpatient fiberoptic bronchoscopy

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Even though the necessity for premedication has been questioned, some combinations of antisialogogues, sedatives and analgesics are usually employed by most bronchoscopists. The goal of this study was to determine whether fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) could be performed safely and effectively without premedication while using a standardized topical anesthetic. Method: Eighty outpatients were randomized in a double-blind manner into group I (n=20) with 1 ml normal saline, group II (n=20) with 0.5mg of atropine, group III (n=20) with 0.5mg of atropine plus 5mg of midazolam, and group IV (n=20) with 0.5mg of atropine plus 50mg of meperidine, given intramuscularly 30 minutes before FOB as premedication. Topical anesthetics administered were same in each group. Each patient was given 5ml (200mg) of 4% nebulized lidocaine and additional intratracheobronchial 2% lidocaine. Oxygen saturation, pulse rate and electrocardiogram were monitored and recorded before, during, just after and 2 minutes after FOB. Immediately after FOB, the bronchoscopists answered four questions such as ease of procedure, extent of coughing, extent of secretion, and overall impression. Before leaving bronchoscopy suite, patients completed similar questions on discomfort during procedure, and willingness to return for a repeat procedure. Results: Age, gender, baseline pulmonary function, dose of 2% lidocaine used for topical anesthesia, and duration of FOB were not significantly different. There was no statistical difference among group I to IV with regard to extent of coughing answered by bronchoscopist. But extent of secretion was significantly different between group I without atropine and group II-IV with atropine. And there was also significant difference in ease of procedure and overall impression among groups. There was no statistical difference in patient's willingness and level of discomfort among the groups. Thirteen patients (16%) showed hypoxemia(arterial oxygen saturation: <90%), and 3 patients (4%) showed significant tachyarrhythmia (heart rate: >160/min), but the rate of complication was not statistically different among the groups. Conclusion: These results suggest that the value of premedication is questionable for outpatient FOB, although it may be necessary in excessively anxious patient.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jun Hee Won, Park, J. Y., Seung Ick Cha, Tae Kyong Kang, Park, K. S., Yeon Jae Kim, … Tae Hoon Jung. (1999). Is premedication necessary for outpatient fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 46(2), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.1999.46.2.251

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free