Arterial spin-labeling in routine clinical practice, part 1: Technique and artifacts

266Citations
Citations of this article
449Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The routine use of arterial spin-labeling (ASL) in a clinical population has led to the depiction of diverse brain pathologic features. Unique challenges in the acquisition, postprocessing, and analysis of cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps are encountered in such a population, and high-quality ASL CBF maps can be generated consistently with attention to quality control and with the use of a dedicated postprocessing pipeline. Familiarity with commonly encountered artifacts can help avoid pitfalls in the interpretation of CBF maps. The purpose of this review was to describe our experience with a heterogeneous collection of ASL perfusion cases with an emphasis on methodology and common artifacts encountered with the technique. In a period of 1 year, more than 3000 pulsed ASL cases were performed as a component of routine clinical brain MR evaluation at both 1.5 and 3T. These ASL studies were analyzed with respect to overall image quality and patterns of perfusion on final gray-scale DICOM images and color Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) CBF maps, and common artifacts and their impact on final image quality were categorized.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deibler, A. R., Pollock, J. M., Kraft, R. A., Tan, H., Burdette, J. H., & Maldjian, J. A. (2008, August). Arterial spin-labeling in routine clinical practice, part 1: Technique and artifacts. American Journal of Neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free