Coupling neural networks to incomplete dynamical systems via variational data assimilation

20Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The advent of the feed-forward neural network (N) model opens the possibility of hybrid neural-dynamical models via variational data assimilation. Such a hybrid model may be used in situations where some variables, difficult to model dynamically, have sufficient data for modeling them empirically with an N. This idea of using an N to replace missing dynamical equations is tested with the Lorenz three-component nonlinear system, where one of the three Lorenz equations is replaced by an N equation. In several experiments, the 4DVAR assimilation approach is used to estimate 1) the N model parameters (26 parameters), 2) two dynamical parameters and three initial conditions for the hybrid model, and 3) the dynamical parameters, initial conditions, and the N parameters (28 parameters plus three initial conditions). Two cases of the Lorenz model-(i) the weakly nonlinear case of quasiperiodic oscillations, and (ii) the highly nonlinear, chaotic case-were chosen to test the forecast skills of the hybrid model. Numerical experiments showed that for the weakly nonlinear case, the hybrid model can be very successful, with forecast skills similar to the original Lorenz model. For the highly nonlinear case, the hybrid model could produce reasonable predictions for at least one cycle of oscillation for most experiments, although poor results were obtained for some experiments. In these failed experiments, the data used for assimilation were often located on one wing of the Lorenz butterfly-shaped attractor, while the system moved to the second wing during the forecast period. The forecasts failed as the model had never been trained with data from the second wing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tang, Y., & Hsieh, W. W. (2001). Coupling neural networks to incomplete dynamical systems via variational data assimilation. Monthly Weather Review, 129(4), 818–834. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0818:CNNTID>2.0.CO;2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free